[ST-01] The Six Ways Your State Changes the Playbook

Healthcare Markets, Income Tax, Estate Tax, Long-Term Care, Asset Protection, and Community Property

Pillar: State Dimension · Applies to: Everyone — especially anyone weighing a retirement relocation Last verified: August 2026 · Refresh cadence: Annual for figures (via ST-04 tables); framework is evergreen Related: ST-02 Retirement-Friendly States, Honestly · ST-03 Changing Domicile · ST-04 Quick-Reference Tables · HC-01 ACA Bridge · HC-02 Medicare 101 · TX-03 Withdrawal Sequencing · EP-05 Estate & Inheritance Taxes

Not advice. State law changes constantly and legislatures love taxing retirees creatively. Verify anything load-bearing against the state’s own revenue and insurance department sites — or ST-04, which holds this wiki’s current values and its refresh date.

---

TL;DR

• “Move to a no-income-tax state” is the retirement equivalent of judging a house by its front door. Six separate dimensions determine what a state actually costs and protects, and they frequently point in opposite directions — Washington is an income-tax paradise and an estate-tax trap simultaneously.
• The dimensions: (1) income tax on your specific income mix, (2) healthcare markets — ACA pricing, Medicaid expansion, Medigap protections, (3) estate & inheritance tax, (4) long-term care and Medicaid LTC, (5) asset protection & property relief, (6) community property & basis step-up.
• The dimension that dominates is the one attached to your biggest number — biggest income stream, biggest asset, or biggest risk. A $4M-pretax household should weight dimension 1; a $6M estate, dimension 3; a health-fragile early retiree, dimension 2.
• The two dimensions nobody ranks are often the largest. State estate taxes start at $1M in Oregon while the federal exemption is $15M, and the community-property double step-up can erase a lifetime of embedded gains at the first spouse’s death. Neither appears in a “most tax-friendly states” listicle.
• The § below prices one household in three adjacent states and gets three different answers, none of which follow from the headline income-tax rate.

---

Dimension 1 — Income Tax (on your mix, not in the abstract)

What matters is the tax on your specific decumulation plan, not the headline rate.

• No-income-tax states (9 of them — list in ST-04 §1.1): Roth conversions, IRA withdrawals, and pensions come out state-free, so the TX-03 “fill” strategy improves by the entire avoided rate, every year, for decades. Caveats hide in the footnotes: Washington levies a capital-gains excise that can cap a large harvest (TX-01), and states without an income tax fund themselves somewhere — property and sales.
• Retirement-income-exempt states: Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Mississippi tax wages but exempt essentially all retirement income. ✅ For a retiree these can beat a “no-tax” state on total cost, because they lean less on property and sales tax to compensate.
• Social Security: 42 states plus DC exempt it entirely; eight still tax some of it ✅ — and all eight gate the tax with income thresholds, so many retirees in them owe nothing. The list shrinks nearly every session (ST-04 §1.2). The binary “does my state tax Social Security” is the wrong question; “does it tax mine, at my income” is the right one.
• The mix test: price your actual Phase 1/2/3 income plan (TX-03) under each candidate state. A $150k/yr conversion plan cares intensely about dimension 1; a dividends-and-basis plan barely notices it.

Dimension 2 — Healthcare Markets (the biggest dollar swings nobody ranks)

• ACA pricing: benchmark silver premiums for a 60-year-old vary roughly 3× by state and county — a bigger annual delta than most state income-tax bills, and it scales your HC-01 subsidy directly (a bigger benchmark means a bigger credit if subsidized, and a brutal bill if you’re over the cliff).
• Medicaid expansion sets your income floor. In the 10 non-expansion states a low-MAGI household can fall into the coverage gap below 100% FPL; in expansion states the floor is 138% FPL. And in four jurisdictions — MN, OR, NY, DC — a Basic Health Program raises the effective floor to 200% FPL, because BHP eligibility blocks the premium tax credit whether or not you enroll (HC-03). This is the single most-missed state healthcare rule in FIRE planning.
• State subsidy layers: several states add their own premium help, and some of it survives above the 400% federal cliff. With the enhanced federal credits expired, these have become materially more valuable and are being re-decided every budget cycle (ST-04 §4.2).
• Medigap protections decide whether the Medicare Advantage one-way door exists for you. A few states require year-round guaranteed issue; a growing list — 15-plus and rising — has a “birthday rule” letting existing Medigap holders switch annually without underwriting; everywhere else, medical underwriting applies once your one-time 6-month window lapses (HC-02 §3, ST-04 §5). In a birthday-rule state the MA decision at 65 is substantially reversible. Everywhere else it may not be.
• Provider reality: networks, hospital quality, and rural access are county questions. A tax-perfect state with a 90-minute drive to cardiology is not tax-perfect at 78.

Dimension 3 — Estate & Inheritance Tax (the federal exemption is a decoy)

The federal exemption is $15M per person (FN-02) — irrelevant to almost every household this wiki serves. The state layer is not.

• Estate tax: 12 states plus DC. ✅ Exemptions run from $1,000,000 in Oregon ✅ — a paid-off house and a 401(k) clear it — up to figures near the federal level in Connecticut. Massachusetts sits at $2M, Washington at $3.0M — frozen — with a 20% top rate, New York at $7.35M. Full table in ST-04 §2.1.
• Inheritance tax: 5 states — Kentucky, Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania ✅ — which tax the heir by relationship class. Children and spouses are usually exempt or low-rate; siblings, nieces, nephews, and friends are not. Maryland has both taxes. New Jersey repealed its estate tax in 2018 but kept the inheritance tax, a distinction national summaries routinely get wrong.
• The trap inside the trap: state-level portability usually does not exist. ◻️ Federally, a surviving spouse can inherit the unused exemption by filing Form 706. Most estate-tax states have no equivalent — only Maryland and Hawaii do ✅ — so an unplanned first death, with everything passing outright to the survivor, wastes an entire state exemption. In Oregon that’s $1M of shelter thrown away by doing nothing. Credit-shelter (bypass) trust planning is the remedy, and it is worth real money in exactly the $2–10M band that federal planning ignores → EP-05.
• Planning consequence: a $5M household can owe $0 at death in Boise and six figures in Portland, on identical assets.

Dimension 4 — Long-Term Care & Medicaid LTC

The dimension people discover at 82, having optimized for the one that mattered at 62.

• State LTC programs: Washington’s WA Cares is the first public LTC benefit of its kind — a payroll tax while working, funding a modest indexed lifetime benefit ◻️ (ST-04, HC-08). Several states are studying clones. The benefit is small, but it reshapes the private-LTCi decision at the margin.
• Medicaid LTC is the payer of last resort for custodial care, and in practice it is state law. Income and asset limits, spousal impoverishment protections for the healthy spouse, home-equity caps, lookback enforcement, and the aggressiveness of estate recovery all vary by state ◻️. Two of these decide whether a married couple is protected or ruined by one spouse’s nursing-home stay.
• Estate recovery scope is the live variable for early retirees, not just the elderly. Federal law mandates recovery only for long-term-care services from the estates of enrollees who were 55 or older — but states may elect to recover ordinary medical costs too. If you are 55–64 and income-planning into Medicaid, your state’s recovery scope is a real reason to lift MAGI over the floor instead (HC-03 §4).
• Partnership-qualified LTCi policies let each insurance dollar shield an asset dollar from Medicaid spend-down — availability and reciprocity between states vary ◻️.

Dimension 5 — Asset Protection & Property

• Homestead exemption: Florida and Texas shield unlimited home value from creditors; most states cap far lower, some at a few thousand dollars ◻️. For litigation-exposed retirees — landlords, former professionals, anyone who drives — this single rule drives relocations on its own.
• Retirement-account creditor protection: ERISA plans (401(k)s) are protected essentially everywhere. IRA protection outside bankruptcy is state law and ranges from bulletproof to thin ◻️. This is a genuine input to the rollover decision at retirement: rolling a 401(k) to an IRA can trade strong federal protection for weak state protection, and nobody mentions it at the exit interview (TR-05).
• Tenancy by the entirety — a couple’s creditor shield on the home, and in some states on accounts — exists in roughly half the states ◻️. Where available it is free protection created by titling.
• Property-tax relief: senior freezes, homestead exemptions, circuit breakers, and deferral programs can cut thousands annually and are means-tested at the state or county level ◻️. They never appear in tax-friendliness rankings, and they disproportionately benefit exactly the low-taxable-income retirees this wiki is written for.

Dimension 6 — Community Property & Basis

Nine states — Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin ✅ — grant the quiet superpower: at the first spouse’s death, both halves of community property step up in basis. Common-law states step up only the decedent’s half.

The consequence is large and almost never planned around. A couple holding $1.2M of stock with $400k of basis has $800k of embedded gain. At the first death:

	Gain erased	Gain still taxable	Tax at 15%
Common-law state	$400k (the decedent’s half)	$400k	$60,000
Community-property state	$800k (both halves)	$0	$0

A $60,000 difference on identical assets, created by domicile alone — and it scales linearly with embedded gain.

It is also why TX-01’s advice to harvest gains reverses in these states late in life: don’t pay tax on gains the first death was about to forgive. (Alaska, Tennessee, and South Dakota offer opt-in community-property trusts ◻️ — a portable version worth knowing exists.)

---

The Same Couple, Three Adjacent States

Married couple, both 62, retiring now. $2.4M traditional IRA, $1.1M taxable (basis $600k), $700k home, $300k Roth. Plan: convert $150,000/year for six years during the TX-03 golden window, then live on the portfolio. Total estate projected at $5M at the second death.

They are choosing between Washington, Oregon, and Idaho — three neighbouring states, one region, one climate. The six dimensions give three different answers.

The conversion program (dimension 1)

	Rate applied	Annual state tax on $150k	Six-year total
Washington	No income tax ✅	$0	$0
Idaho	5.3% flat ✅	$7,950	$47,700
Oregon	~8.75% marginal band ◻️ (graduated 4.75%–9.9% ✅)	~$13,125	~$78,750

Oregon costs roughly $78,750 more than Washington to run the identical ladder — before the estate question, and before anything is inherited.

The estate (dimension 3)

	Exemption	Taxable at second death	Outcome
Idaho	No estate tax ✅	$0	$0
Washington	$3.00M ✅ (frozen)	$2.00M	Six figures, at rates to 20% ✅
Oregon	$1,000,000 ✅	$4,000,000	Six figures, larger, at rates to 16% ◻️

And in Washington and Oregon, a first death that leaves everything outright to the survivor generally wastes the deceased spouse’s state exemption ◻️ — the no-portability trap. Idaho has nothing to waste.

The rest of the board

Dimension	Washington	Oregon	Idaho
2 — ACA floor before 65	138% FPL ✅	200% FPL — Basic Health Program ✅	138% FPL ✅
2 — Medigap after 65	Year-round switching for existing holders ◻️	Birthday rule ◻️	Birthday rule ◻️
6 — Community property	Yes ✅	No ✅	Yes ✅
1 — Gain harvesting	Capped by the capital-gains excise ◻️	Fully taxable as income	5.3% flat

Reading the result

Idaho wins the estate question outright and the income question comfortably. Washington wins the income question outright and loses the estate question badly. Oregon loses both — and raises their pre-65 ACA floor to 200% FPL on top.

For this couple — $5M estate, big conversion program, six years to Medicare — Idaho is the answer, and it is not the state any “no income tax” ranking would have surfaced, because Idaho has an income tax and Washington doesn’t. The headline dimension pointed at the wrong state.

Change one input and the answer moves: at a $2.5M estate, Washington’s exemption covers them and its zero income tax wins. At a $12M estate with large low-basis holdings, Washington’s double step-up (dimension 6) starts offsetting its estate tax and the question genuinely reopens. The framework is the deliverable, not the ranking.

---

Three Scenarios

A. The conversion-heavy couple (as above, $5M estate). Dimensions 1 and 3 dominate and they point at different states. Resolved by pricing both: the six-year conversion delta (~$78,750 Oregon vs. Washington) is real but smaller than the estate delta at a $5M estate, so the estate dimension wins the tie. They also sequence the move before the conversions start (ST-03) — arriving after the ladder has run would have paid the old state’s tax for nothing.

B. The lean-FIRE couple, MAGI ~$40k, both 52. Dimensions 2 and 5 dominate; dimensions 1 and 3 are nearly irrelevant because they owe little income tax anywhere and have no estate exposure. The state question collapses into three lookups: is it an expansion state, does it run a Basic Health Program that raises their floor to 200% FPL, and what does their county’s benchmark silver plan cost. A cheap-benchmark county in an expansion state with a state subsidy layer beats every income-tax argument at their bracket.

C. The landlord with a liability tail, 66. Dimension 5 leads and nothing else is close. Florida or Texas homestead protection plus tenancy-by-the-entirety titling shields the home from a judgment that income-tax planning cannot touch. He also checks IRA creditor protection before rolling his 401(k) (TR-05) — in a weak-protection state, not rolling is the asset-protection move, and it costs him nothing but flexibility.

---

💡 Pro-Tips

1. Price the plan, not the state: run your actual 30-year TX-03 income script through each candidate’s rules. An afternoon of arithmetic outperforms every listicle ever published.
2. Identify your biggest number first. Biggest income stream → dimension 1. Biggest asset → dimensions 3 and 6. Biggest risk → dimensions 2, 4, 5. Optimize that one and let the rest be tiebreakers.
3. Check the county, not just the state, for ACA benchmarks, Medicare Advantage networks, and property tax — intra-state variation routinely exceeds inter-state.
4. Sequence moves around big income events (ST-03): convert after leaving the taxed state, harvest before leaving a step-up-friendly one, and mind that sticky states audit departures.
5. Estate-tax states punish the $2–10M band hardest — the range federal planning ignores entirely. If you’re in it and in one of the 13 jurisdictions, ask about a credit-shelter trust before assuming portability saves you.
6. Ask about Medigap switching rules before choosing Medicare Advantage anywhere. Your state may have already disarmed the one-way door — or may not have.
7. Don’t roll the 401(k) reflexively if your state’s IRA creditor protection is weak and you carry liability exposure.
8. Keep a “state file”: the statutes behind your homestead, exemption, and exclusion claims, refreshed annually against ST-04.

⚠️ Common Pitfalls

1. Ranking states by income tax while holding a $6M estate — optimizing the small number with precision.
2. Assuming “no income tax” means no tax on your gains (Washington’s excise) or low total cost (Texas property tax).
3. Moving to a non-expansion state on a lean-FIRE income and discovering the coverage gap after the move.
4. Clearing 138% FPL in a Basic Health Program state and still getting no premium credit, because eligibility — not enrollment — is what blocks it.
5. Losing a state estate exemption to the absence of portability at an unplanned first death, which is the default outcome, not an edge case.
6. Leaving assets to siblings or friends in an inheritance-tax state without checking the relationship class rates.
7. Retiring rural for cost without pricing healthcare access you’ll need a decade later.
8. Treating a move as done when the boxes arrive — sticky former states audit domicile; ST-03 is mandatory reading before, not after.
9. Forgetting the step-up dimension entirely — the most valuable rule no ranking includes, and worth six figures to a couple with appreciated holdings.
10. Checking state rules once, at the move. Legislatures revisit these every session; ST-04 exists because the answers move.

✅ Actionable Checklist

Framing

• Write down your biggest number (income stream / asset / risk) — that’s your lead dimension
• Score your current state and each candidate across all six (ST-02 builds the weighting)

Pricing (the part most people skip)

• Run your conversion/withdrawal plan through each candidate’s income-tax schedule (ST-04 §1)
• Compute estate exposure at both the first and second death, assuming no portability (ST-04 §2)
• Pull your candidate ZIP’s actual ACA benchmark premium and check expansion + Basic Health Program status (ST-04 §3)
• Check Medigap switching rights for the state you’ll be in at 65 (ST-04 §5)

Before moving

• Read ST-03 and sequence income events around the move date
• Check IRA creditor protection and homestead limits if you carry liability exposure
• If married with appreciated taxable holdings, price the community-property step-up on both sides of the move

Annually

• Refresh figures against ST-04; re-check anything marked ◻️ against the state’s own agency

Sources & further reading (verified Aug 2026)

• ST-04 State Quick-Reference Tables — this wiki’s current values for every list referenced above, with its own refresh date and per-section primary sources
• Tax Foundation state tax data (Oregon graduated 4.75%–9.9%; Idaho flat 5.3%); state departments of revenue for the authoritative schedules
• KFF state health facts (Medicaid expansion status, marketplace type, benchmark premiums); state departments of insurance (Medigap rules)
• FN-02 for federal thresholds the state layer sits on top of; HC-03 for the Medicaid and Basic Health Program floors; EP-05 for estate-tax mechanics; ST-03 for domicile mechanics